Last week Nikon announced their new entry-level camera, the
Nikon D3200. The camera comes in either red or black (it seems that gone are the
days that black and chrome were the only options if there was an option at all…but
why on earth red?) and sports a 24mp APS-C sensor. It’s the sensor that’s the talking
point as little else has changed from the D3100. 24mp! That’s a lot. To add to
that; that’s a lot of resolution for an entry level camera. So is this a wise decision
of Nikons?
It’s interesting to remember that at one stage Nikon fans
were defending their turf with comments that you “don’t need lots of megapixels”
and that “it’s the quality, not the quantity”, while Canon seemed to be ramping
up the megapixels on a six monthly basis. Do those same Nikon fans now say that
Canon, with their lower megapixel count is a better and wiser camera
manufacturer? I thought not. No, the Nikon fans are now crowing that Nikon
wears the resolution crown. Silly really.
I’ll get to the sensor in a moment. First, my thoughts on
the camera as a whole. The D3100 has been an incredibly popular entry level
camera for the past year. It has about the right size in the hand that it doesn’t
intimidate the new user. This is more important than it seems as a vast number
of its users are women. Then there’s the attractive price-point. It is one of
the cheapest DSLRs available. When you look at store discounts and forget that
the EOS 450D is still available in some mass-mart like stores, it is often the
cheapest DSLR available, and is therefore always on the list of potentials when
a user is thinking about moving from a point and shoot to a DSLR. The
advertising is also aimed at the ease of use, again tempting point and shoot
users with its promise of simplicity and ease.
click through to continue reading.
click through to continue reading.